đ Believe Half on Seeing, Never Believe on Hearing – What I Think About ChatGPT and GeminiāĻোāĻে āĻĻেāĻা āĻিāύিāϏেāϰ āĻ āϰ্āϧেāĻ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāϏ ā¤ा⤍ों ⤏ु⤍ी ā¤ā¤ी ā¤Žā¤¤ ā¤Žा⤍ो।”
✍️ Disclaimer
This blog is written from a personal and philosophical perspective. I am not an expert in psychology, philosophy, or artificial intelligence, but a learner and observer. The thoughts shared here are my interpretations of human experiences and my personal opinions about AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini. Readers are encouraged to think critically, do their own research, and form their own opinions.
---
Part 1: English Section
Introduction
There is an old saying: “Believe half of what you see and never believe what you hear.”
This proverb teaches us to be cautious. Human senses are powerful, but they are not perfect. Our eyes may deceive us, and our ears may mislead us. In today’s world, where information spreads faster than ever—through news, social media, or artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT and Gemini (Google’s AI)—this proverb becomes more meaningful than ever.
In this blog, I will explore:
What does believe half on seeing really mean?
Why should we never believe on hearing without proof?
How do these ideas apply to modern AI like ChatGPT and Gemini?
My personal thoughts and experiences with both platforms.
Philosophical, practical, and futuristic insights.
This blog will move slowly, in layers, so that the meaning becomes deeper and clearer step by step.
---
1. Believe Half on Seeing
Seeing is one of the most reliable senses we have. When we see something, we often trust it immediately. Yet, vision is not absolute truth. For example:
A stick in water looks bent, though it is straight.
A mirage in the desert looks like water, though it is just hot air.
A magician shows us tricks that seem real, but are illusions.
This is why the proverb says: Believe only half of what you see. Even seeing is not always the final proof. We need reasoning, evidence, and cross-verification.
---
2. Never Believe on Hearing
Hearing is even less reliable than seeing. What we hear is filtered through another person’s voice, intention, and understanding. A rumor may spread without any truth. A story may be exaggerated or manipulated. Words can be sweet but misleading.
For example:
Gossip can destroy reputations without evidence.
Fake news spreads faster than truth.
A promise may sound convincing but never come true.
Thus, we must be extremely cautious with what we hear. Unless hearing is supported by evidence, it is often unreliable.
---
3. Applying this Wisdom to AI (ChatGPT & Gemini)
Today, we live in the age of artificial intelligence. Tools like ChatGPT (by OpenAI) and Gemini (by Google) are changing the way we think, work, and learn. But how do we apply the proverb here?
Seeing (Outputs of AI):
When we use ChatGPT or Gemini, we “see” their answers on the screen. But should we believe them completely? No. We must believe only half. Because AI sometimes produces wrong answers, biased results, or incomplete information.
Hearing (Opinions about AI):
When we hear people say, “ChatGPT is perfect” or “Gemini is the best,” we should not blindly believe it. These are just opinions. Every user has a different experience. Some love ChatGPT’s creativity, others prefer Gemini’s accuracy. But truth lies somewhere in between.
Thus, the proverb perfectly matches the world of AI.
---
4. My Thoughts on ChatGPT
ChatGPT is like a friendly companion. It helps me brainstorm ideas, write blogs, understand concepts, and even reflect on philosophy. But I know it is not always correct. It sometimes invents details or gives overly polished answers. So I follow the rule: Believe half of what you see. I double-check facts, but I value its ability to spark new ideas.
---
5. My Thoughts on Gemini
Gemini feels more like a researcher. It tries to connect information with the web and often gives data-backed answers. However, it sometimes feels mechanical or less warm compared to ChatGPT. Again, I apply the same rule: Believe half of what you see. Gemini can give facts, but I must verify them from other sources.
---
6. Comparing ChatGPT and Gemini
ChatGPT = Creative, conversational, inspiring.
Gemini = Factual, data-driven, precise.
Both are valuable, but both have limits. Neither should be trusted fully without cross-checking.
---
7. Philosophy Behind My Thinking
The proverb is not against seeing or hearing. It is simply a reminder: Don’t trust blindly. Always analyze, question, and verify. Whether it is human speech, media news, or AI-generated answers, truth requires deeper examination.
---
8. Practical Life Lessons
When you see success stories on social media, believe only half. There may be hidden struggles.
When you hear negative rumors about someone, don’t accept them without proof.
When AI gives you answers, don’t rely fully. Cross-check with books, experts, or official sources.
---
9. The Future of Trust in AI
In the coming years, AI will grow stronger. But trust will always remain a key issue. The wisdom of “believe half on seeing, never believe on hearing” will continue to guide us. We must treat AI not as the final truth but as a tool to explore truth.
---
10. Conclusion
To me, ChatGPT and Gemini are like two wise friends—helpful but not infallible. They expand my thinking but cannot replace human judgment. I apply the ancient wisdom:
See → Believe Half
Hear → Believe None until verified
This philosophy keeps me balanced in a world of overwhelming information.
---
Part 2: āĻŦাংāϞা (Bengali) Section
āĻূāĻŽিāĻা
āĻāĻāĻি āĻĒ্āϰাāĻীāύ āĻĒ্āϰāĻŦাāĻĻ āĻāĻে: “āĻোāĻে āĻĻেāĻা āĻিāύিāϏেāϰ āĻ
āϰ্āϧেāĻ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāϏ āĻāϰো, āĻāϰ āĻাāύে āĻļোāύা āĻāĻāύāĻ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāϏ āĻāϰো āύা।”
āĻāĻ āĻāĻĨাāϰ āĻāĻীāϰ āĻ
āϰ্āĻĨ āĻāĻāĻেāϰ āϤāĻĨ্āϝ-āĻĒ্āϰāϝুāĻ্āϤিāϰ āϝুāĻে āĻāϰāĻ āĻুāϰুāϤ্āĻŦāĻĒূāϰ্āĻŖ। āĻāĻŽāϰা āĻĻেāĻি, āĻļুāύি, āĻĒā§ি, āĻিāύ্āϤু āϏāĻŦāϏāĻŽā§ āĻি āϤা āϏāϤ্āϝ?
āĻāĻāĻেāϰ āĻŦ্āϞāĻে āĻāĻŽি āĻŦāϞāĻŦ:
āĻেāύ āĻোāĻে āĻĻেāĻāϞেāĻ āĻĒুāϰো āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāϏ āĻāϰা āĻ িāĻ āύā§,
āĻেāύ āĻাāύে āĻļোāύা āĻāĻĨাā§ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāϏ āĻāϰা āĻŦিāĻĒāĻ্āĻāύāĻ,
āĻিāĻাāĻŦে āĻāĻ āĻļিāĻ্āώাāĻে ChatGPT āĻ Gemini’āϰ āĻŽāϤো āĻāĻāĻ āĻুāϞে āĻĒ্āϰā§োāĻ āĻāϰা āϝাā§,
āĻāĻŦং āĻāĻŽি āĻŦ্āϝāĻ্āϤিāĻāϤāĻাāĻŦে āĻāĻĻেāϰ āϏāĻŽ্āĻĒāϰ্āĻে āĻী āĻাāĻŦি।
---
āĻোāĻে āĻĻেāĻা āĻŽাāύে āĻি āϏāϤ্āϝি?
āĻোāĻে āĻĻেāĻা āĻিāύিāϏāĻ āĻ
āύেāĻāϏāĻŽā§ āĻ্āϰাāύ্āϤ āĻšāϤে āĻĒাāϰে। āĻŽāϰুāĻূāĻŽিāϤে āĻŽāϰীāĻিāĻা āĻĻেāĻা āϝাā§, āĻĒাāύিāϤে āĻাāĻ ি āĻŦাঁāĻা āĻĻেāĻাā§, āĻāĻŦাāϰ āĻাāĻĻুāĻāϰেāϰ āĻেāϞা āĻোāĻāĻে āĻুāϞিā§ে āĻĻেā§। āϤাāĻ āĻĒ্āϰāĻŦাāĻĻ āĻŦāϞে: āĻ
āϰ্āϧেāĻ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāϏ āĻāϰো।
---
āĻাāύে āĻļোāύা āĻāĻāύāĻ āύā§
āĻāĻĨা āĻŽাāύুāώেāϰ āĻŽāύেāϰ āĻĒ্āϰāϤিāĻĢāϞāύ। āĻ
āύেāĻāϏāĻŽā§ āĻāĻŦāϰ āĻুāĻāĻŦ āĻšā§, āĻĒ্āϰāϤিāĻļ্āϰুāϤি āĻāĻ্āĻ āĻšā§, āĻāϏিāĻĒ āĻŽাāύুāώāĻে āϧ্āĻŦংāϏ āĻāϰে। āϤাāĻ āĻাāύে āĻļোāύা āĻিāύিāϏ āĻĒ্āϰāĻŽাāĻŖ āĻাā§া āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāϏ āĻāϰা āĻŦিāĻĒāĻĻāĻāύāĻ।
---
ChatGPT āĻ Gemini’āϰ āĻ্āώেāϤ্āϰে āĻĒ্āϰāϝোāĻ্āϝāϤা
ChatGPT āĻāĻŽাāĻĻেāϰ āϏৃāĻāύāĻļীāϞāϤা āĻŦাā§াā§, āĻāĻāĻĄিā§া āĻĻেā§। āĻিāύ্āϤু āϏāĻŦ āϤāĻĨ্āϝ āϏāĻ িāĻ āύাāĻ āĻšāϤে āĻĒাāϰে।
Gemini āϤāĻĨ্āϝāĻিāϤ্āϤিāĻ āĻāϤ্āϤāϰ āĻĻেā§, āϤāĻŦে āĻāĻāύāĻ āϝাāύ্āϤ্āϰিāĻ āĻŽāύে āĻšā§।
āϤাāĻ āĻāĻাāύে āύিā§āĻŽ āĻšāϞো: āĻোāĻে āĻĻেāĻা → āĻ
āϰ্āϧেāĻ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāϏ। āĻাāύে āĻļোāύা → āĻāĻāύāĻ āύā§।
---
āĻāĻŽাāϰ āĻাāĻŦāύা
āĻāĻŽি ChatGPT-āĻে āĻŦāύ্āϧু āĻŽāύে āĻāϰি, Gemini-āĻে āĻāĻŦেāώāĻ āĻŽāύে āĻāϰি। āϤāĻŦে āĻাāĻāĻেāĻ āĻ
āύ্āϧāĻাāĻŦে āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāϏ āĻāϰি āύা। āĻāϰা āĻāĻŽাāϰ āĻিāύ্āϤা āĻĒ্āϰāϏাāϰিāϤ āĻāϰে, āĻিāύ্āϤু āĻļেāώ āϏিāĻĻ্āϧাāύ্āϤ āĻāĻŽাāϰāĻ।
---
āĻāĻĒāϏংāĻšাāϰ
āĻāĻ āĻĒ্āϰāĻŦাāĻĻ āĻāĻŽাāĻĻেāϰ āĻļেāĻাā§: āĻ
āύ্āϧāĻাāĻŦে āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāϏ āύā§। āĻŦিāĻļ্āϞেāώāĻŖ āĻāϰো, āϝাāĻাāĻ āĻāϰো, āϤাāϰāĻĒāϰ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāϏ āĻāϰো।
AI āĻšোāĻ āĻŦা āĻŽাāύুāώেāϰ āĻāĻĨা, āϏāĻŦāϏāĻŽā§ āĻāĻ āĻļিāĻ্āώা āĻাāĻে āϞাāĻāĻŦে।
---
Part 3: ā¤šिंā¤Ļी (Hindi) Section
ā¤Ē्⤰⤏्⤤ाā¤ĩ⤍ा
ā¤ā¤ ā¤ā¤šाā¤ĩ⤤ ā¤šै: “ā¤ंā¤ों ā¤Ļेā¤ी ā¤ā¤§ी ā¤Žा⤍ो, ā¤ा⤍ों ⤏ु⤍ी ā¤ā¤ी ā¤Žā¤¤ ā¤Žा⤍ो।”
ā¤¯ā¤š ā¤ā¤šाā¤ĩ⤤ ā¤ā¤ ā¤ी ⤏ूā¤ā¤¨ा-ā¤Ē्⤰ौā¤Ļ्⤝ोā¤िā¤ी ā¤ā¤° AI ā¤े ⤝ुā¤ ā¤Žें ā¤Ŧā¤šु⤤ ⤏ā¤ी⤠ā¤Ŧै⤠⤤ी ā¤šै।
---
ā¤ंā¤ों ā¤Ļेā¤ी ā¤ā¤§ी ā¤्⤝ों?
ā¤ंā¤ें ā¤ी ⤧ोā¤ा ā¤ा ⤏ā¤ā¤¤ी ā¤šैं—
⤰ेā¤ि⤏्⤤ा⤍ ā¤Žें ā¤Žृā¤ā¤¤ृ⤎्⤪ा,
ā¤Ēा⤍ी ā¤Žें ā¤ेā¤ĸ़ी ā¤Ļिā¤ā¤¤ी ⤞ā¤ā¤Ą़ी,
ā¤ाā¤Ļूā¤ā¤° ā¤ा ā¤्ā¤°ā¤Ž।
ā¤ā¤¸ā¤˛ि⤠ā¤ंā¤ों ā¤Ļेā¤ी ā¤ी ā¤Ēू⤰ी ⤏ā¤्ā¤ाā¤ ā¤¨ā¤šीं ā¤šो⤤ी।
---
ā¤ा⤍ों ⤏ु⤍ी ā¤्⤝ों ā¤¨ā¤šीं?
ā¤ा⤍ों ⤏े ⤏ु⤍ी ā¤Ŧा⤤ ā¤
ā¤्⤏⤰ ā¤
ā¤Ģā¤ĩाā¤š, ā¤Ŧā¤ĸ़ा-ā¤ā¤ĸ़ाā¤ā¤° ā¤ā¤šी ⤝ा ā¤
⤧ू⤰ी ā¤šो⤤ी ā¤šै।
ā¤ॉ⤏िā¤Ē, ā¤ू⤠ी ā¤ā¤Ŧ⤰ें ā¤ā¤° ā¤
⤧ू⤰े ā¤ĩाā¤Ļे ā¤šā¤Žें ā¤ुā¤Žā¤°ाā¤š ā¤ā¤° ā¤Ļे⤤े ā¤šैं।
---
ChatGPT ā¤ā¤° Gemini ā¤े ⤏ंā¤Ļ⤰्ā¤ ā¤Žें
ChatGPT: ⤰ā¤ā¤¨ा⤤्ā¤Žā¤, ā¤Ļो⤏्⤤ा⤍ा, ⤞ेā¤ि⤍ ā¤ā¤ी-ā¤ā¤ी ā¤ā¤˛ā¤¤ ā¤ा⤍ā¤ा⤰ी ā¤Ļे⤤ा ā¤šै।
Gemini: ⤤ā¤Ĩ्⤝ā¤Ēू⤰्⤪, ā¤Ąेā¤ा ā¤ā¤§ा⤰ि⤤, ā¤Ē⤰ ā¤Ĩोā¤Ą़ा ⤠ंā¤Ąा।
ā¤Ļो⤍ों ā¤Žā¤Ļā¤Ļā¤ा⤰ ā¤šैं, ā¤Ē⤰ ā¤Ļो⤍ों ā¤ो ā¤ांā¤ā¤¨ा ā¤़⤰ू⤰ी ā¤šै।
---
ā¤Žे⤰ी ⤏ोā¤
ā¤Žैं ChatGPT ā¤ो ā¤ĩिā¤ा⤰ों ā¤ा ⤏ाā¤Ĩी ā¤Žा⤍⤤ा ā¤šूं, ā¤ā¤° Gemini ā¤ो ā¤ļो⤧ ā¤ा ⤏ा⤧⤍। ⤞ेā¤ि⤍ ā¤Ļो⤍ों ā¤ी ⤏ीā¤Žाā¤ं ā¤šैं। ā¤ā¤¸ā¤˛ि⤠ā¤ंā¤ों ā¤Ļेā¤ी ā¤ā¤§ी ā¤Žा⤍⤤ा ā¤šूं ā¤ā¤° ā¤ा⤍ों ⤏ु⤍ी ā¤Ŧि⤍ा ā¤Ē्ā¤°ā¤Žा⤪ ā¤¨ā¤šीं ā¤Žा⤍⤤ा।
---
⤍ि⤎्ā¤ā¤°्⤎
ā¤¯ā¤š ā¤ā¤šाā¤ĩ⤤ ā¤šā¤Žें ⤝ाā¤Ļ ā¤Ļि⤞ा⤤ी ā¤šै:
ā¤Ļेā¤ा → ā¤ā¤§ा ā¤ā¤°ो⤏ा
⤏ु⤍ा → ā¤Ŧि⤍ा ⤏ā¤Ŧू⤤ ā¤ā¤°ो⤏ा ā¤Žā¤¤ ā¤ā¤°ो
AI ā¤šो ⤝ा ā¤ं⤏ा⤍, ā¤¯ā¤š ā¤Ļ⤰्ā¤ļ⤍ ā¤šā¤Žें ⤏ं⤤ु⤞ि⤤ ā¤ā¤° ⤏ā¤े⤤ ⤰ā¤ā¤¤ा ā¤šै।
Comments
Post a Comment