PART 4 (FINAL),Who Owns the Land Left Behind?A Legal, Historical, and Human Analysis of Property Rights After Migration to Pakistan or BangladeshPART 4 (FINAL): Conclusions, Myths, FAQs, and Legal Closure31. The Central Question RevisitedAfter history, law, courts, and ground reality, we return to the original question:If a person migrated to Pakistan or Bangladesh, did they remain the owner of their share of land in India?l
PART 4 (FINAL), Who Owns the Land Left Behind? A Legal, Historical, and Human Analysis of Property Rights After Migration to Pakistan or Bangladesh PART 4 (FINAL): Conclusions, Myths, FAQs, and Legal Closure 31. The Central Question Revisited After history, law, courts, and ground reality, we return to the original question: If a person migrated to Pakistan or Bangladesh, did they remain the owner of their share of land in India? Final Legal Answer đ In the overwhelming majority of cases: NO. Once a person: Migrated permanently Acquired foreign citizenship Or was legally declared an evacuee Their ownership rights ended, and their property vested in the State. This is not opinion. This is settled law. 32. Why the Law Took Such a Harsh Position The evacuee property regime may feel cruel, but it was shaped by: National security concerns Mass displacement chaos Need for refugee rehabilitation Fear of endless property disputes The State chose finality over flexibility. History ...